Sorry for the stupid question, but if it wasn't Moos's impetus then whose was it?
Not trying to argue -- really just wondering how it got started.
-
You do not need to register if you are not going to pay the yearly fee to post. If you register please click here or log in go to "settings" then "my account" then "User Upgrades" and you can renew.
Moos out?
- Thread starter Stewdogg
- Start date
Not trying to argue -- really just wondering how it got started.
objective? yet these objective others say it is their opinion, not, we know for a fact...
The AD looked into it, period, it doesn't matter who suggested it. The buck stops at the AD!
Last edited:
it doesn't matter, the AD looked into it.. it is that simple!
Like I said believe what you want. I'll trust the opinion of a guy who has a very close relationship with Moos (Sip).
If it was Bill, the OWH would have had added it to the list of offensives as the reason for his removal, such as not being present, spending time at his ranch, etc. but they didn't.
Multiple media members believe it was Scott who started this, and apparently had Greene on board. Moos was not aware, and when it was leaked, if you remember our athletic department took several hours on a Friday to respond, well I am sure they were hastily trying to figure out what was happening behind the scenes. Moos finally put out a statement and took the heat as is required with his role.
From this day forward, at least from an outward perspective things appeared to have changed with Moos. Instead of trying to get to a bowl game, he was now talking 8 wins minimum, really cranking up the hype. Moos was even clowning Scott saying how we even struggle to beat Illinois, which was a very odd thing to say from the AD. One could guess why his comments seemed to turn, I know what mine would be.
I will, thanks, as you clearly are. DB was never a huge fan of the Frost hire, not surprised he took the first opportunity to try to make him look bad..
I am not for or against either one of them.
I think the new AD will be someone, perhaps, who wasn't even on the initial "list." Trev has both admin. AD experience and is a Husker legend. He "checks" both boxes. However, I tend to agree with posters who believe it SHOULD BE someone who is comfortable and has shown great skill in dealing with media, other administrators (i.e. Chancellors/COP--BIG) and who has a person in their office who will EDIT every tweet, post, etc., before it goes out to the media. I am in administration and my deputy director and I speak in person/through email/on the phone several times a day. He is my best critic and editor. He doesn't want my job and, I don't want his--a very unique and healthy symbiotic relationship. "Nuff said.
Skill set(s) needs to trump gender or race.
Thanks for explaining, but yikes. If true it reflects very poorly on both Moos and Frost.
It does indeed. If true the head man was trying to remove one of the greatest college rivals to save himself, not a good look. Of course Scott doesn’t remember how the OU game conversation came up or who started it lol.
What are you talking about? When did DB say he wasn't a fan of Frost being hired?
Just curious, what names out there would get you excited?
I don't want us to hire another "animal" or a "Karen". Speaking of which, do we need Kevin's approval to hire our new AD????????? I would assume that EdS is a good man, but looking at his AD/management experience, there is always a reason that someone is a "deputy," instead of "the big boss."
@RED CRUSADER, I wouldn't be so dismissive of his Deputy role at the Commissioner level. He has executive level experience at both a Power 5 school and a longer run in the commissioner's office of a P5 conference. Ed could bring some fresh perspective to the Athletic office.
