Not true.If they determined there wasn't probable cause for an indictment, then you have to conclude that he is, in fact, not guilty.
Not true.If they determined there wasn't probable cause for an indictment, then you have to conclude that he is, in fact, not guilty.
The problem with black and white rules is it’s impossible to separate the different levels of the scenarios that could exist in the future. During an argument that involved both sides he scratched her trying to get her to remove the bathing suit he paid for. Does that meat the same criteria of a player getting in an altercation with another player in a locker room? Does a guy shoving a player up against a locker require a similar penalty?That’s the best case scenario for Rhule. It should be a decision above the coach and handled by the administration. The rules should be in black & white and spelled out for all offenses including drugs, cheating etc.
In my school district several years ago I was attacked ( verbally) for suggesting that administration should handle EVERYTHING it’s not a team or coaches decision. Make it clear to cocahes, players, the community and everyone else the decision is an administrative one period.
This in my opinion is BS. I hate everything about what his posts have been in this thread but I can’t understand the two week vacation based on “political”. That’s a very strong interpretation that quite frankly appears to be in my “opinion ” political motivated. I saw zero reference to any politics.You earned a few weeks off for your political post
RR
This in my opinion is BS. I hate everything about what his posts have been in this thread but I can’t understand the two week vacation based on “political”. That’s a very strong interpretation that quite frankly appears to be in my “option” political motivated. I saw zero reference to any politics.
Ok. Well my apologies to the moderators then. I guess in all fairness the announcement of 2 week vacations and warnings to the board do little good if they delete the posts. How the heck can a poster receive a warning for political posts referencing a poster if they deleted the post. Leave it up so we can see what the standard is.FYI…the political references by the member in this thread and the several responses to the posts have already been deleted.
Ok. Well my apologies to the moderators then. I guess in all fairness the announcement of 2 week vacations and warnings to the board do little good if they delete the posts. How the heck can a poster receive a warning for political posts referencing a poster if they deleted the post. Leave it up so we can see what the standard is.
This in my opinion is BS. I hate everything about what his posts have been in this thread but I can’t understand the two week vacation based on “political”. That’s a very strong interpretation that quite frankly appears to be in my “opinion ” political motivated. I saw zero reference to any politics.
Ok. Well my apologies to the moderators then. I guess in all fairness the announcement of 2 week vacations and warnings to the board do little good if they delete the posts. How the heck can a poster receive a warning for political posts referencing a poster if they deleted the post. Leave it up so we can see what the standard is.