Awwww, so the lack of logically response to my post causes you to result to name calling........:lol: How cute. A wacko.....I've been called worse by pre-teen boys whom I refused to allow have a rest room break before a test.....Step your game and maturity up homie.
And who cares if Dawson would have changed the game. No one denies that, but regardless of anything you are using to belittle the win with, that Spartan squad is still far more superior in talent over the Huskers without him. Even without Dawson, that team wins 8 times out of ten on a neutral court. Just so happens they lost this one at home vs a team that wasn't suppose to accomplish much of anything. Are you suggesting that without Dawson, MSU is the worst team in the conference, because that's exactly what the Huskers were predicted to be this season, while they had everyone healthy and before losing Deverell Biggs whom contributed 9.9 points off the bench for 15 games. Upsets are big wins for the program who gets the win column. And to a program that has accomplished nothing in it's history, beating a team that consistently is amongst the top programs every season, defeating them on their home court is a GREAT win even if they are missing a star player. It's stupid to suggest that without Dawson then the MSU squad is equal or a worse team than the Huskers (on paper). That day, the Huskers were a better team.
The Huskers have never been a dynamic scoring team all season. So you stressing that they only shot 36% for the game means next to nothing. They average 42% on the season. MSU stat is 47% from the field on the season, yet, they were held to 32% for that game. Where's your logic that they played better defense than Nebraska? Oh, YOU are the only one in the nation who thinks MSU missing shots had nothing to do with Nebraska having 5 players on the court. I'm not sure how Izzo can call the huskers junkyard dogs and his players were wide open more times than not........yet, but I'm the "wacko" right?...
Here's the funny thing about your "MSU missing wide open shots" philosophy. Of their 50 shots taken inside the 3 pt line, 33 of them failed to go in. And of that 33 team failed attempts, 24 of them were 15 ft or closer to the rim. You mind explaining where exactly the Husker defenders were, because obviously many of those shots must have been wide open mishaps by the Spartans. How does Izzo call that type of defense a junkyard dog type performance? What was he thinking?
Tell you what, I'll start smoking what ever it is you keep promoting as soon as you make that call to East Lansing and inform Coach on what he obviously was missing because he was way to complimentary of the Huskers that game.
:lol: Sorry, to see someone call another person a "wacko" makes me think of Napoleon Dynamite type individuals. It's comedy that someone would think that type of name calling is effective in some sort. Thanks for the laugh. It's almost as funny as your overall style of posting.
HRD, thank you for trying to help me realize the error of my ways. But to be honest, I am not much interested in getting help from you. Psychiatrists never seek counseling from folks they perceive as wackos, and neither do I.
But, I am glad you are having fun. I am glad that you were elated by the win over MSU. Myself, I thought NU played much better against Purdue than they did against MSU, but NU always plays better at home than they do on the road. Gotta Thank TO for getting the Pinnacle arena built. It has become a great venue for Husker BB.
So, NU is on the road against Illinois on Wednesday. I hope they can play like the home team this time. They are gaining confidence with each win. The road win against MSU should help their confidence against Illinois. This 5-game run the Huskers are on, and the fact that they still have a shot at making the big dance is making things very interesting right now. I have never been this excited about husker men's BB.
Last edited:
