Levi Falck Will Return For A Sixth Season In 2021

[BasilLongfellow]

I think your comment might be rock bottom....

Eye roll. I am not engorged over walk on wide receivers.

maybe if we could keep our four stars, that would be something to be excited about

 

[Red Reign]

Congratulations to the kid for trying hard.

Maybe someday we can be a winning team, too. That would be a nice change.
At least we have good grades!!!!!

Not sure why you feel the need to go after this kid?

Top notch kid who has brought leadership and a good work ethic to the team

Yeah not going to play in the NFL but got his dream of playing his dream in FBS and as a walk-on we got our monies worth from him

 

[Red Reign]

Eye roll. I am not engorged over walk on wide receivers.

maybe if we could keep our four stars, that would be something to be excited about

Your totally missing the point of this

So be it

Cheers

 

[goodnterribles]

Congratulations to the kid for trying hard.

Maybe someday we can be a winning team, too. That would be a nice change.
At least we have good grades!!!!!

You sound like some other poster on here who thought he was the greatest.

 

[CrabHusker]

I think I stepped in something.

 

[BasilLongfellow]

Your totally missing the point of this

So be it

Cheers

The point of the post I responded to was that the “culture” on the offense is in great shape because there is a 6th year walk on returning to play receiver.

That point ludicrous. Our flag ship player just transferred; barring a last minute miracle, our other play maker is transferring, too.
Meanwhile, we are excited about a 6th year walk on that is going to take snaps away from the younger players that might actually fix this program.

I want to see the Huskers win, not have the best grades in the conference.

 

[BasilLongfellow]

You sound like some other poster on here who thought he was the greatest.

You make me smile.

 

[Red Reign]

The point of the post I responded to was that the “culture” on the offense is in great shape because there is a 6th year walk on returning to play receiver.

That point ludicrous. Our flag ship player just transferred; barring a last minute miracle, our other play maker is transferring, too.
Meanwhile, we are excited about a 6th year walk on that is going to take snaps away from the younger players that might actually fix this program.

I want to see the Huskers win, not have the best grades in the conference.

Okay I will give you that but with that being said you could have worded it differently

 

[goodnterribles]

You make me smile.

You don't.

 

[lo country]

The point of the post I responded to was that the “culture” on the offense is in great shape because there is a 6th year walk on returning to play receiver.

That point ludicrous. Our flag ship player just transferred; barring a last minute miracle, our other play maker is transferring, too.
Meanwhile, we are excited about a 6th year walk on that is going to take snaps away from the younger players that might actually fix this program.

I want to see the Huskers win, not have the best grades in the conference.

I've said this before that perhaps Frost needs to concentrate on kids who have the "want to". Do a better job at developing and subsequently keeping that talent we have/get. To date, the RB room (of returning carries) is basically void of depth. Same for the receivers room. We have had Mo, Bell leave. JD and Wan'dale.....Maybe the staff is a little star struck. Not saying we shouldn't go after those guys. We should. BUT maybe really dirt dive into their desire to play and compete at NU. The staff also needs to show they can develop the kids. Maybe I am in the minority, but I see progress on the defensive side. Not so much on the offensive side. TBH, more regression there. BUT, the defense has some obvious leaders. It has seniors who know the scheme and can be an extra "coach on the field". On O, going into year 4, IMHO, we are void of that depth of senior leadership. At least at the skill position. I no longer know who the back up to Cam is at center....Frost's best O to date was 2018....With veteran (seniors) at RB/WR and the OL....

But to the OP, Falck has proven himself to be a solid and reliable receiver who goes 100%. Hunter Renfrow comes to mind. He has good size compared to "veteran" guys at 6'2/205......We are going to need guys besides the staff next year that know the scheme. He will help with this. And nothing wrong with a guy that has that "want to".....And can block....And play ST.....NU seems to be short of that from the on field results.

 

[solesrfr]

I've said this before that perhaps Frost needs to concentrate on kids who have the "want to". Do a better job at developing and subsequently keeping that talent we have/get. To date, the RB room (of returning carries) is basically void of depth. Same for the receivers room. We have had Mo, Bell leave. JD and Wan'dale.....Maybe the staff is a little star struck. Not saying we shouldn't go after those guys. We should. BUT maybe really dirt dive into their desire to play and compete at NU. The staff also needs to show they can develop the kids. Maybe I am in the minority, but I see progress on the defensive side. Not so much on the offensive side. TBH, more regression there. BUT, the defense has some obvious leaders. It has seniors who know the scheme and can be an extra "coach on the field". On O, going into year 4, IMHO, we are void of that depth of senior leadership. At least at the skill position. I no longer know who the back up to Cam is at center....Frost's best O to date was 2018....With veteran (seniors) at RB/WR and the OL....

But to the OP, Falck has proven himself to be a solid and reliable receiver who goes 100%. Hunter Renfrow comes to mind. He has good size compared to "veteran" guys at 6'2/205......We are going to need guys besides the staff next year that know the scheme. He will help with this. And nothing wrong with a guy that has that "want to".....And can block....And play ST.....NU seems to be short of that from the on field results.

If he is half as good as Hunter I will be over the moon.

Year	School	Conf	Class	Pos	G	Rec	Yds	Avg	TD	Att	Yds	Avg	TD	Plays	Yds	Avg	TD

*2015	Clemson	ACC	FR	WR	13	33	492	14.9	5	0	0		0	33	492	14.9	5
*2016	Clemson	ACC	SO	WR	11	44	495	11.3	6	0	0		0	44	495	11.3	6
*2017	Clemson	ACC	JR	WR	14	60	602	10.0	3	0	0		0	60	602	10.0	3
*2018	Clemson	ACC	SR	WR	15	49	544	11.1	1	0	0		0	49	544	11.1	1
Career	Clemson					186	2133	11.5	15	0	0		0	186

C

 

[SavageHusker]

Seems we already bad mouth the; Coaches, Recruits, Former Players, Current Players, the AD and each other / the fans, so who's left too Bad mouth? the Cheerleaders?

The strippers at the Night Before? No guys weekend is complete without a stop.

 

[goodnterribles]

If he is half as good as Hunter I will be over the moon.

Year	School	Conf	Class	Pos	G	Rec	Yds	Avg	TD	Att	Yds	Avg	TD	Plays	Yds	Avg	TD

*2015	Clemson	ACC	FR	WR	13	33	492	14.9	5	0	0		0	33	492	14.9	5
*2016	Clemson	ACC	SO	WR	11	44	495	11.3	6	0	0		0	44	495	11.3	6
*2017	Clemson	ACC	JR	WR	14	60	602	10.0	3	0	0		0	60	602	10.0	3
*2018	Clemson	ACC	SR	WR	15	49	544	11.1	1	0	0		0	49	544	11.1	1
Career	Clemson					186	2133	11.5	15	0	0		0	186

C

Well I hope Renfro didn't have a good GPA, because that's frowned upon.

 

[lo country]

If he is half as good as Hunter I will be over the moon.

Year	School	Conf	Class	Pos	G	Rec	Yds	Avg	TD	Att	Yds	Avg	TD	Plays	Yds	Avg	TD

*2015	Clemson	ACC	FR	WR	13	33	492	14.9	5	0	0		0	33	492	14.9	5
*2016	Clemson	ACC	SO	WR	11	44	495	11.3	6	0	0		0	44	495	11.3	6
*2017	Clemson	ACC	JR	WR	14	60	602	10.0	3	0	0		0	60	602	10.0	3
*2018	Clemson	ACC	SR	WR	15	49	544	11.1	1	0	0		0	49	544	11.1	1
Career	Clemson					186	2133	11.5	15	0	0		0	186

C

Clemson is the other team I follow. No doubt about Hunter. Came in as a 5'10 155 walk-on nad well, balled out. Found a niche in the scheme and became a security blanket for the QB's. Not saying Levi will be that guy, but I have learned to never say never...

 

[solesrfr]

Well I hope Renfro didn't have a good GPA, because that's frowned upon.

I don't get it. I assume it is just another shot at other posters.



C