If there is not enough for a conviction the suspicion is pled to reckless driving.
A quick note: A plea to a lesser charge does not mean that there was not sufficient facts for a conviction of the original charge.
If there is not enough for a conviction the suspicion is pled to reckless driving.
I'm fine with the plea to a lesser charge, with Bo's punishment, and just about everything else...but I don't buy that he was texting and not asleep.
Whatever he was doing, it was enough for at least two people to believe he was asleep or passed out: The person who called the police and the police officer who parked his unit behind Caputo, most likely spot-lighted the car and approached on the side of the car. That must have been one groovy text message he was reading.
Double negatives always confuse me. What do you really mean here?A quick note: A plea to a lesser charge does not mean that there was not sufficient facts for a conviction of the original charge.
Double negatives always confuse me. What do you really mean here?
What I am asking is, isn't this true also? A plea to a lesser charge does not mean that there was sufficient facts for a conviction of the original charge.
You will search from here to hell freezes over to find where I have implied, stated or otherwise indicated Caputo was innocent!So if you're "innocent", why take the plea deal?
Double negatives always confuse me. What do you really mean here?
What I am asking is, isn't this true also? A plea to a lesser charge does not mean that there was sufficient facts for a conviction of the original charge.
You will search from here to hell freezes over to find where I have implied, stated or otherwise indicated Caputo was innocent!
You missed the message of the carol: We all got a sweetheart deal.WoW....just had a bunch of young ladies come to the door and sing me a Christmas carol....
THen I come back here and sit down and think...I wonder which one of them will get hit by a drunk who's plea bargained his way out of previous DUIs