• You do not need to register if you are not going to pay the yearly fee to post. If you register please click here or log in go to "settings" then "my account" then "User Upgrades" and you can renew.

Bill Moos Book

How does TO always get a pass on this? He was/is just as responsible.

There is a business succession planning concept that you never let a super star choose his successor(s). Despite all conscious efforts, the super star will tend to choose successors that will not be as successful as he was. It's a very subconscious thing, but it is a fundamental cardinal sin in the corporate world. The human ego of a super star is not up to this task.
 
Last edited:
Of course Moos is going to provide a version of the story that paints him in the best light. But if he thought Frost wasn't ready he shouldn't have hired him. That's just poor leadership. Frost could possibly have succeeded elsewhere,but knowing what we know now he probably wouldn't have.

The flip side is if Moos hadn't hired Frost and he'd gone 16-31 at Tennessee then moos would've looked like a genius instead of getting chased out of town.
Totally depends on who he hired instead of Frost. Who were the other candidates at the time?
 
There is a business succession planning concept that you never let a super star choose his successor(s). Despite all conscious efforts, the super star will tend to choose successors that will not be as successful as he was. It's a very subconscious thing, but it is a fundamental cardinal sin in the corporate world. The human ego of a super star is not up to this task.
I don't think TO had a superstar ego... but I do think he was (dis)colored by loyalty. He was so reliant on his assistants and felt such gratitude and loyalty towards them that it prevented him from objectively evaluating them especially for a role that they had never been in before.

Your point still stands though!
 
At the time Moos hired Frost it was generally viewed as a grand slam no-brainer. In fact, Moos is probably the best AD we’ve ever had in terms of hiring high profile coaches with Frost and Hoiberg.
 
Additionally I fault Moos, not for hiring SF, but for not monitoring and managing him better AFTER he hired him.
This is the part where I'd put the most condemnation. Again, I think it is really easy in hindsight for him to come out now and say, "I thought he was too immature". If that was really how he felt and he was responsible for his success, he needed to do more to help correct, nurture, discipline out, those issues.
 
This is the part where I'd put the most condemnation. Again, I think it is really easy in hindsight for him to come out now and say, "I thought he was too immature". If that was really how he felt and he was responsible for his success, he needed to do more to help correct, nurture, discipline out, those issues.

How much time was Moos in Lincoln?
Washington is a long ways away from the AD office.
 
Last edited:
Totally depends on who he hired instead of Frost. Who were the other candidates at the time?

Chip Kelly
And who knows how much traction there actually was to that claim. Moos makes it sound like it was a done deal, but who knows if that's true.

It also isn't like Kelly set the world on fire at UCLA. He was in as hot of a seat as Frost those first few years. The difference is he actually found a bit of success toward the end of his tenure there. Clearly UCLA and Nebraska aren't the same situations, but there is no guarantee that would have worked out well, either.
 
There is a business succession planning concept that you never let a super star choose his successor(s). Despite all conscious efforts, the super star will tend to choose successors that will not be as successful as he was. It's a very subconscious thing, but it is a fundamental cardinal sin in the corporate world. The human ego of a super star is not up to this task.
Oh I think it was a very conscious thing. As TO told a booster friend, “there are enough statues in Lincoln”.
 

GET TICKETS





Back
Top