How does TO always get a pass on this? He was/is just as responsible.The choice to hire Frost was made by his bosses.
How does TO always get a pass on this? He was/is just as responsible.The choice to hire Frost was made by his bosses.
How does TO always get a pass on this? He was/is just as responsible.
Getting into this thread pretty late, but I really could care less what Bill Moos has to say. Nothing he says will help us going forward. Bottom line is that most of our big sports programs are performing well. Football is the one area that really needs to get its act together.

Totally depends on who he hired instead of Frost. Who were the other candidates at the time?Of course Moos is going to provide a version of the story that paints him in the best light. But if he thought Frost wasn't ready he shouldn't have hired him. That's just poor leadership. Frost could possibly have succeeded elsewhere,but knowing what we know now he probably wouldn't have.
The flip side is if Moos hadn't hired Frost and he'd gone 16-31 at Tennessee then moos would've looked like a genius instead of getting chased out of town.
Chip KellyTotally depends on who he hired instead of Frost. Who were the other candidates at the time?
I don't think TO had a superstar ego... but I do think he was (dis)colored by loyalty. He was so reliant on his assistants and felt such gratitude and loyalty towards them that it prevented him from objectively evaluating them especially for a role that they had never been in before.There is a business succession planning concept that you never let a super star choose his successor(s). Despite all conscious efforts, the super star will tend to choose successors that will not be as successful as he was. It's a very subconscious thing, but it is a fundamental cardinal sin in the corporate world. The human ego of a super star is not up to this task.
He shouldn't.How does TO always get a pass on this? He was/is just as responsible.
At the time Moos hired Frost it was generally viewed as a grand slam no-brainer. In fact, Moos is probably the best AD we’ve ever had in terms of hiring high profile coaches with Frost and Hoiberg.
Totally depends on who he hired instead of Frost. Who were the other candidates at the time?
This is the part where I'd put the most condemnation. Again, I think it is really easy in hindsight for him to come out now and say, "I thought he was too immature". If that was really how he felt and he was responsible for his success, he needed to do more to help correct, nurture, discipline out, those issues.Additionally I fault Moos, not for hiring SF, but for not monitoring and managing him better AFTER he hired him.
This is the part where I'd put the most condemnation. Again, I think it is really easy in hindsight for him to come out now and say, "I thought he was too immature". If that was really how he felt and he was responsible for his success, he needed to do more to help correct, nurture, discipline out, those issues.
Totally depends on who he hired instead of Frost. Who were the other candidates at the time?
And who knows how much traction there actually was to that claim. Moos makes it sound like it was a done deal, but who knows if that's true.Chip Kelly
Sounds like this was a portion of the problem. Would have a lot more respect for Moos if he detailed out how he tried to fix/correct Frost, rather than just saying "I knew better". By the sound of it, neither was the right fit for either job.How much time was Moos in Lincoln?
Oh I think it was a very conscious thing. As TO told a booster friend, “there are enough statues in Lincoln”.There is a business succession planning concept that you never let a super star choose his successor(s). Despite all conscious efforts, the super star will tend to choose successors that will not be as successful as he was. It's a very subconscious thing, but it is a fundamental cardinal sin in the corporate world. The human ego of a super star is not up to this task.