• You do not need to register if you are not going to pay the yearly fee to post. If you register please click here or log in go to "settings" then "my account" then "User Upgrades" and you can renew.

BIG Tournament format is dumb

It is oddball but Sean Callahan explained that it is being done this way to cut down the number of games played in the tournament. The maximum games played is four. Last year the Huskers played six, and then entered the NCAAs worn out. I don't like the pod setup, I'm guessing the powers that be will come up with something better in the future.


Don't bet on it.
 
If it wasn’t for the money, I’d be so happy to leave the Big Ten. Poor officiating in every sport, worst conf network, dumb tournaments, name everything they do and it is bad.
So true! The above "bold" are my pet peeves. The network is a waste! They could do a lot better with their programming. They waste so much on repeats, not showing other teams' games that were on B10+, for instance!
 
If Illinois, the #11 seed, beat Michigan on Tuesday and UCLA on Wednesday, they would have two days off and then play in semi's on Saturday. Oregon, the #1 seed plays Thursday and Friday. If they play in championship game they would play 4 games in 4 days. Illinois would play 2 have 2 off and then play 2 again, if it made it to the championship game. Advantage #11 seed.

The only advantage I see with this format, is top 4 teams can lose a game and still get to semis. For example, if Iowa got beat by Indiana or Rutgers, they could still advance to semi's and then win the whole thing or if they made it to the championship game, they might still get an at large bid. In single elimination format, the loss could hurt their chances of getting an at large bid.

But as others have said, there are so many meaningless games. If Nebraska loses tonight and Oregon beats Michigan State on Thursday the Friday night finale between Nebraska and Oregon is irrelevant as Oregon advances regardless of who wins. While some die hard Husker fans may go, who is going to watch other games when nothing is on the line. They got Washington and USC playing at 10:00 a.m. on Friday (8 PT time). If Washington has no shot of making it to semi's who is going to watch?
 
If Illinois, the #11 seed, beat Michigan on Tuesday and UCLA on Wednesday, they would have two days off and then play in semi's on Saturday. Oregon, the #1 seed plays Thursday and Friday. If they play in championship game they would play 4 games in 4 days. Illinois would play 2 have 2 off and then play 2 again, if it made it to the championship game. Advantage #11 seed.

The only advantage I see with this format, is top 4 teams can lose a game and still get to semis. For example, if Iowa got beat by Indiana or Rutgers, they could still advance to semi's and then win the whole thing or if they made it to the championship game, they might still get an at large bid. In single elimination format, the loss could hurt their chances of getting an at large bid.

But as others have said, there are so many meaningless games. If Nebraska loses tonight and Oregon beats Michigan State on Thursday the Friday night finale between Nebraska and Oregon is irrelevant as Oregon advances regardless of who wins. While some die hard Husker fans may go, who is going to watch other games when nothing is on the line. They got Washington and USC playing at 10:00 a.m. on Friday (8 PT time). If Washington has no shot of making it to semi's who is going to watch?
But if NU wins, the Thursday game between OU and MSU is meaningless.
If Illinois, the #11 seed, beat Michigan on Tuesday and UCLA on Wednesday, they would have two days off and then play in semi's on Saturday. Oregon, the #1 seed plays Thursday and Friday. If they play in championship game they would play 4 games in 4 days. Illinois would play 2 have 2 off and then play 2 again, if it made it to the championship game. Advantage #11 seed.

The only advantage I see with this format, is top 4 teams can lose a game and still get to semis. For example, if Iowa got beat by Indiana or Rutgers, they could still advance to semi's and then win the whole thing or if they made it to the championship game, they might still get an at large bid. In single elimination format, the loss could hurt their chances of getting an at large bid.

But as others have said, there are so many meaningless games. If Nebraska loses tonight and Oregon beats Michigan State on Thursday the Friday night finale between Nebraska and Oregon is irrelevant as Oregon advances regardless of who wins. While some die hard Husker fans may go, who is going to watch other games when nothing is on the line. They got Washington and USC playing at 10:00 a.m. on Friday (8 PT time). If Washington has no shot of making it to semi's who is going to watch?
It's not like they just have to win 1 of 2, they have to beat the winner of the 1st game. The other game is completely irrelevant. And since the lower seed games are all first, the top 4 seeds know which game matters and which one doesn't before they play. They are likely going to the bottom of the bullpen in that other game.
 
Yeah, this set up is a head scratcher. The pools are fine, just eliminate that meaningless game. MSU vs. NU, the winner plays OR for a spot in the semifinal.
That makes me wonder -- can teams opt out of their meaninglessness game? Because the loser of the 1st game in each pod is out (except for that meaningless game to look forward to).

It would be like the "if necessary" game in a tournament, except it happens sooner.



P.S. HUSKERS WIN!!!!!
 

GET TICKETS





Back
Top