Raiola completed 72% of his passes. So the number of times it didn't come out is less than the number of times it did.
There were 8 players with larger Yards/Reception averages than Barney.
There were 3 players with a longer reception than Barney.
The rest is more subjective than objective.
I don't think the issues at QB were decisive QB play ... Raiola was pretty consistent. I do think O-Line has an affect.
For someone who is supposed to be "fast" ... we didn't see enough YAC from Barney. We didn't see explosive pass plays from him.
Raiola ranked approximately 8th–12th in the Big Ten for YPA among primary starters (exact spot varies slightly by qualifier—e.g., minimum attempts per game or total). His 8.0 was respectable but below the explosive top tier (who often pushed 9+ with more deep shots). He excelled in accuracy (top nationally in completion % at injury time) and limiting turnovers, but his scheme leaned toward shorter, high-percentage throws (lower air yards per attempt) compared to the conference's big-play leaders.
-Grok
I liken it to several factors. We cant ignore DRs clock in his head wasnt good, and our O line wasnt stellar. By design or preference a quick passing game was in order, and if the majority of the calls were for quick passes, while he did make them at a high rate, hurries and sacks were stacking up even so.I realize this is about Barney, but I found this interesting:
It seemed to me during the season that, whether by design or circumstance, Raiola's attempts where largely short range passes. This may have been due to no one getting open downfield, but I had a sense that Raiola's accuracy suffered on long range attempts. I'd like to see completion % rates by zone-short, mid, and long range. My guess is that his long range completion rate was relatively low, not because Barney et. al. weren't open, but because coaches and/or Raiola weren't confident in his long range accuracy and opted for safer, shorter passes. There's also a chance, and this is subjective, as you said, that Raiola opted for shorter range passes to pad his stats.
Among WRs, Barney led in Receptions with 45, was 2nd in total yards with 484. While he was 6th Y/C, there were only 3 WRs that had more than 9 receptions: Barney (45,) Hunter (43,) Key (39.) (If you don't want to limit the number of receptions to greater than 9, our best WR, Hunter, was 4th in Y/C.) Barney was actually last in Y/C in that group, but that's not a major knock against him, IMO.
[Edit: my source for stats is SportsReference.]
Not to mention the Big 8 finished one, two and three
As far as I know only time that ever happened
Very interesting facts and comments ...my first reaction was the downfield passing game lacked WRs who could win 1-on-1 battles and create separation. I agree the O-Line did not help in regard to creating time to pass downfield.I realize this is about Barney, but I found this interesting:
It seemed to me during the season that, whether by design or circumstance, Raiola's attempts where largely short range passes. This may have been due to no one getting open downfield, but I had a sense that Raiola's accuracy suffered on long range attempts. I'd like to see completion % rates by zone-short, mid, and long range. My guess is that his long range completion rate was relatively low, not because Barney et. al. weren't open, but because coaches and/or Raiola weren't confident in his long range accuracy and opted for safer, shorter passes. There's also a chance, and this is subjective, as you said, that Raiola opted for shorter range passes to pad his stats.
Among WRs, Barney led in Receptions with 45, was 2nd in total yards with 484. While he was 6th Y/C, there were only 3 WRs that had more than 9 receptions: Barney (45,) Hunter (43,) Key (39.) (If you don't want to limit the number of receptions to greater than 9, our best WR, Hunter, was 4th in Y/C.) Barney was actually last in Y/C in that group, but that's not a major knock against him, IMO.
[Edit: my source for stats is SportsReference.]
All i know is Barney is one tough dude! Took monster hits and always popped right back up!Absolutely disagree.
Trying to force the ball to Barney is/was a problem.
Barney needs to work on route running and getting himself open in the route tree. If he is to make the NFL it’s likely as a slot receiver. If he wants to achieve success at that level he needs to simply be able to get open. All too often he is covered downfield because his footwork, explosiveness and separation is inadequate.
Because he cannot get open NU is forced to get him the ball in creative ways (screens, reverses) that simply do not work well.
Everyone in the country knew when Barney was on field that NU was going to throw to him on a screen or an out route. Make those options effective by getting open downfield first.
Agree with you about his toughness.All i know is Barney is one tough dude! Took monster hits and always popped right back up!
He seems to relish it lol!Agree with you about his toughness.
Another reason to stop throwing so many screens and running so man jet sweeps ... propensity to get hit is higher!
THIS … is why I think our run game will be fine.
There is no EJ walking through that door but what we get is going to be good enough IMO.