O-line is the problem but Jurgens had no snaps issues against MN and he blocks better than most of our O-linemen.
Bando has got to see regular duty, I would move him to RT, move Farniok to RG and Boe Wilson to LG.
This line run blocks better than it pass blocks but we have no explosive I back! Washington and Wan'dale are wingbacks/slot receivers (think Johnny Rodgers). I you use them at I back for more than one game, you will get them injured, especially in Big Ten play as we have seen. If they come back, we need to keep them out wide with spot duty only in the backfield.
So it would be Mills at fullback and Brody at I back and shades of the 1970's grind out first down football but with Warner back as a possession receiver we may need to go to that with Stoll and Allen in the Hook routes.
Goal: score 21-24 points a game, control the clock, no turnovers. We have no playmakers to make Scotts UCF offense run.
Your bolded part is incorrect. Jurgens consistently launched the ball below the optimal height and often places it off center. This is neither 'no snap issues' or much of an improvement over his previous outings. Jurgens rolled the ball back to Vedral at times! People, Vedral, made it look easy. And Jurgens is weak with his snap. Sorry, but this experiment has made the entire team suffer. The cold, hard truth is Jurgens is not getting the first job done required from his position, snapping the ball correctly. Everything beyond the poor snap means very little. If the first job is done incorrectly then it is failure on the play. Making Vedral, Martinez, or Bunch lower their eyes every snap is a needless distraction. Watch the Minnesota center, consistently delivered the ball each time with emphasis to the correct placement!
And Brody Belt at tailback?? You have a Porsche 911 (Mills) yet you're proposing to drive the V4 Mustang (Belt)? Absurd.
The bread and butter of the I formation is the power play, not the fullback give/ride. Where is the power coming from when you run the I with Belt? I can tell you that Mills will be more effective as the tailback in the I than as a fullback. Him running fullback just spoke of his versatility.If you are in the I formation yes, Mills is a better fullback than he is a tailback. In the single back then yes, Mills in the game before Brody.
All the best.
GBR.
It would be great to see all the stops pulled to win the next three. Stuff like putting Carlos Davis in as an H-back on the goal-line.