I feel like the much of your post is based in assumption or hearsay. Your info about transfers is very wrong, flat out; transfers have been key at UNL and in college basketball as a whole. Look at this article "How Nevada basketball banked on transfers to turn into a top 25 team" . Look at Wes Clark at Buffalo, transfer from Missou, was huge in that win over Zona.Charles Matthews at Michigan? Malik Newman at Kansas? Marcus Foster? Those guys make a difference. After all, "basketball, unlike football, can be changed 180 degrees from a talent standpoint with just 1 player." I should add James Palmer to the list, Big Ten Newcomer of the Year. Why is everyone so hesitant to give Miles some props for bringing a guy like Palmer on board? Oh, right because transfers are pocket change and the four stars that Miles brings in, aren't 4 star enough.
Danny Nee was at Nebraska for 14 years and "was close to that guy". This program will never build into anything if we don't support a coach after a season like he just had
Your faith in moos building this basketball program is unfounded.
Right, counting on transfers is a great long-term play to build a program. I could stop right there, and just let your reply die a slow death, but I'll help you speed the process.
If I'm not mistaken, we had a top 25 team that was in large part due to transfers a few years ago, and how did that turn out in building a program? And you are going to toss in a Buffalo win over Zona, and 2 complimentary players at otherwise stacked programs as justification for Miles RELYING on transfers to build a program, or at very least, make us competitive? When a transfer falls in your lap, that icing on the cake, it's not a mainstay of building a reliable foundation of a program! Miles appears to like to chase shiny objects. He doesn't want to work to recruit a kid and develop him over 4 years, he wants instant gratification, and that includes the kids he does recruit.
NeeBraska basketball was a completely different era, and patience, as we've learned, isn't in the same place as it was 2 decades ago. Heck, Tom Osborne, the king of patience cut loose Doc Sadler with a 53% win percentage while getting us to 3 NITs and Doc took over a frickin' trainwreck. We've heard every excuse in the world why we can't put a consistently good product on the floor: We're a football school (well, not for the last 20 years), Recruiting is a struggle, The facilities are poor, We aren't willing to pay for a coach. All of that is pure crap, we've simply made some poor management choices, and just like in football, we need a really carefully thought out decision should we decide to make a change.
What you fail to understand is I really like Miles, and I have seen him improve in certain areas. What drives me nuts is he continues to put a sloppy product on the court. Some teams with loads of talent can get away with that, like Kentucky, but most need some structure. Look at Nova, look at Sparty, look at those teams no one thought had a chance in the NCAAs, they all play with some semblance of structure. Miles has been weak with that from day one, and he's failed to address it, either by staffing, or by relinquishing that portion of the team's development to one of the assistants. If Miles keeps the defections down, and puts together another solid year, he's going to make cash. If he looks lost like he did in 2016-2017, he's going to have a lot more time to entertain on Twitter.