D
Deleted member 3561
Guest
But if you wanted a super simple score-keeping method for coaching hires, I'd do it by comparing power rankings year-to-year. If the rankings are good rankings, that should tell you something about actual improvement or regression regardless of wins and losses (and I would argue knowing about either is actually more important than wins and losses in a Year 1).
So let's do that quick just to try and get a sense of what just happened at Nebraska. I'll use S&P+ as the power ranking of choice here as I like its component parts the best and understand them the most.
Frost jumped 46 spots. Nebraska finished 103rd in 2017 under Riley and 57th this year. During his first year at UCF he jumped 48 spots.
While Frost's 2018 was good, it only ranks third among this season's "freshman class" of coaches. Dan Mullen engineered the biggest jump at Florida, which might say more about just how bizarre the Gators' fall to 4-7 was a year ago under Jim McElwain. Chad Lunsford and Georgia Southern took second place in 2018. That one feels a little more emblematic of what's actually happening in Statesboro. Lunsford's jump would be closer to No. 1 this season if he hadn't taken over on an interim basis halfway through last season and went 2-4 no doubt bumping the Eagles' ranking slightly at the end of 2017.
Obviously a lot can change year over year, but Nebraska is power ranked ahead of every team on their schedule next year except for 4: Ohio St, Purdue, Wisconsin and Iowa. I maintain that 8 wins is the barometer of success next year. And I feel like Nebraska should be able to steal one or two wins next year. So I don't think 10 wins is out of the question.
https://hailvarsity.com/s/5591/hot-reads-how-does-frosts-first-year-stack-up-against-others