That’s a great article. I was surprised when Creighton hired McDermott. At the time, the dude was probably the worst coach that the Big 12 had seen in a while. I remember watching that team with all those NBA players on it, It was brutally hard to watch players of that caliber be so horrible. I remember Doc and him having some games that made me want to jump off a bridge. IIRC, there was a game where it was 19-11 at halftime. I’m not sure what happened there but I know he was a lot better coach than that. He’s proved it pre-ISU and he’s certainly proved it post-ISU.
That epiphany he had was next-level because he has Creighton’s program rolling. They move the ball so well and it’s such a fun system to play in. If I was a recruit, that’s the type of system I would like to play him. He seems like a genuinely nice guy, easy to root for.
Question for the Creighton fans on the board. Obviously, having Dana Altman was crucial to Creighton’s success the past 20 years, but how much of of their success can be attributed to the A.D.? I think people give too much credit to coaches for the success of programs. Coaches are the most important, but as Nebraska football fans, we all know that if your not right up top, it rolls down hill. Rasmussen seems like a really good A.D. with a sound vision. I’m sure you guys agree, but just how much credit should does he get?