$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ says it won't win this case. Football will continue with a few modifications.
I agree with this. There are probably a lot of potential cases out there that will change the game, but I don’t think this is one of them.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ says it won't win this case. Football will continue with a few modifications.
So far the research that I’ve Googled and read has been leaning I think to the fact that CTE starts almost immediately in sports with head trauma…
“Leaning”.....”I think”......”fact”
That’s not how it works. But you’re making a great argument to get rid of girls HS soccer in this thread.
“Leaning”.....”I think”......”fact”
That’s not how it works. But you’re making a great argument to get rid of girls HS soccer in this thread.
Earlier in the thread, you dismissed the conclusion/solution from another poster with a semantics argument.I was expressing my nonscientific interpretation of the literature that I read… if you Google and read the information for yourself… Perhaps you will come up with a separate conclusion. That is how it works...
I am not interested in"Gotcha" Posting. I would love to hear your thoughts on the subject though… not just how you think I didn't post correctly. If you think I lack the intuitive resources to add it to the discussion… Perhaps you could show me by example?
No, research has shown that 96% of NFL players WHO ALREADY SUSPECTED THEY HAD CTE AND DONATED THEIR BRAINS FOR RESEARCH were correct in their assumptions.At this point it looks like researchers have determined that almost 100% of NFL players have suffered CTE… I guess the scientific research will have to backtrack and see where it starts and how prevalent it is at the youngest age groups. So far the research that I’ve Googled and read has been leaning I think to the fact that CTE starts almost immediately in sports with head trauma…
This is what I have said. The difference in size between the smallest and the largest players is huge. Look at the Olines and D lines of the Late seventies early eighties. No where near what they are now. Those guys were mostly 240-260 lbs. It was mid 90s when linemen really started getting huge. When a 200 lb RB gets thrown down by a guy who is 240. Not as much risk as the same 200# back getting thrown to the ground by a 350# DL. Just pure physics.Don't want to derail here, but: Boxing continues to have fewer great athletes, Bud Crawford is an exception. MMA allows blows to the head, BUT fights end much quicker than boxing (rare to see someone get knocked down more than 2x, allowed to finish instead of "recover").
On topic: Leather helmets are a better option, or wrestling ear protectors. Instead of minimum size, American football might end up with "maximum size" requirements. This is where science is taking the game, not some 'wussification factor'. Football can't be played without injury and concussions, but there's almost no activity that can. Everyone who cares about the game will need to be involved to make it safer. Now we are learning that brain injuries have lasting effects and can't ignore it.
One of the most vicious hits (in terms of damage) was Dana Brinson going full speed and getting decked by a linebacker who weighed 100 pounds more. Brinson got a lacerated liver out of the tackle. Now we have super fast guys who weigh 160 and fast guys who weigh 300. Not saying it's the end of the sport, just a risk that is now amplified.This is what I have said. The difference in size between the smallest and the largest players is huge. Look at the Olines and D lines of the Late seventies early eighties. No where near what they are now. Those guys were mostly 240-260 lbs. It was mid 90s when linemen really started getting huge. When a 200 lb RB gets thrown down by a guy who is 240. Not as much risk as the same 200# back getting thrown to the ground by a 350# DL. Just pure physics.
I was expressing my nonscientific interpretation of the literature that I read… if you Google and read the information for yourself… Perhaps you will come up with a separate conclusion. That is how it works...
If you think I lack the intuitive resources to add it to the discussion… Perhaps you could show me by example?
Link?At this point it looks like researchers have determined that almost 100% of NFL players have suffered CTE
NMRidulous. Denial is your best friend.
Link?
Don't smoke, it can kill you, don't play football it can kill you, don't box it can kill you, don't ride a motorcycle it can kill you, don't do drugs it can kill you. As a matter of fact don't get out of bed it can kill you.
There we should be covered. They maybe didn't know it back then but anyone in the last 10-15 years that did any of the above should never be allowed to sue because they knew that whatever it was they were doing could potential harm them.
Oversimplified but that is how I feel.[/QUOTE
Unfortunately all of the above is good for business.....
absolutely understand and agree with your point.One of the most vicious hits (in terms of damage) was Dana Brinson going full speed and getting decked by a linebacker who weighed 100 pounds more. Brinson got a lacerated liver out of the tackle. Now we have super fast guys who weigh 160 and fast guys who weigh 300. Not saying it's the end of the sport, just a risk that is now amplified.
I don't see anything there that supports this claim of yours:Post #5
At this point it looks like researchers have determined that almost 100% of NFL players have suffered CTE
What I’m doing isn’t gotcha posting. My point is that you’re posting theories based on incomplete data sets and calling them facts. That doesn’t work.I was expressing my nonscientific interpretation of the literature that I read… if you Google and read the information for yourself… Perhaps you will come up with a separate conclusion. That is how it works...
I am not interested in"Gotcha" Posting. I would love to hear your thoughts on the subject though… not just how you think I didn't post correctly. If you think I lack the intuitive resources to add it to the discussion… Perhaps you could show me by example?