-
Recruit
Over head 8.5 games?
Am i the only one betting big on this? 8.5 games. Seems easy for coach bo.
USM - W
ucla - w ( could be tougher than originally thought though)
arkanasas state w
Idaho State W
wisconsin should be win ( revenge factor plus wisc lost lot of coaches and key players
Ohio state ( toss up)
northwester ( W) should be some revenge from last year on this game
michigan ( toss up)
mich state toss up
penn state W
Minn W
Iowa should be W
Maybe looks a little tougher on paper than i thought, but still feel Nebraska should win 9 games.
Whats everyone else think?
and my over/under 8.5 games. Idk what i was thinking. Mods help!
-
-
I think it's about right.
-
 Originally Posted by mjw11
over
9-3
I agree. With a little luck we get to 10-2, but that probably means beating Wisconsin and Michigan at home.
The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!
-
There is much better action to be found than this, I would advise Husker fans to avoid risking their money on this prop bet.
http://bigrednetwork.com/story/over_..._open_big_ten/
Here are the over/under totals for some of the better Big Ten schools along with the additional betting odds:
Ohio State Over 8.5 (-180) Under 8.5 (+150)
Wisconsin Over 8.5 (-160) Under 8.5 (+130)
Michigan Over 8.5 (-160) Under 8.5 (+130)
Michigan State Over 8.5 (-140) Under 8.5 (+110)
Nebraska Over 8.5 (-125) Under 8.5 (-105)
Iowa Over 7.5 (+110) Under 7.5 (-140)
Penn State Over 6.5 (-150) Under 6.5 (+120)
Illinois Over 6.5 (-120) Under 6.5 (-110)
Bear Bryant:
"But it's still a coach's game. Make no mistake. You start at the top. If you don't have a good one at the top, you don't have a cut dog's chance. If you do, the rest falls into place."
-
The only thing worse than having nothing to say is saying it.
-
Originally Posted by Pop Corn
-
Originally Posted by Pop Corn
So which side of the prop bet are you foolishly wagering? Both are bad bets BTW, even though one side will win.
Bear Bryant:
"But it's still a coach's game. Make no mistake. You start at the top. If you don't have a good one at the top, you don't have a cut dog's chance. If you do, the rest falls into place."
-
Recruit
Ill take the over!! I think our offense wins us a few close games for a change! The bet will be a nailbiter...that is for sure
-
Originally Posted by CombatTargeteer
I trust 57
Originally Posted by HuskerWeatherman
He is the messiah.
-
Originally Posted by Greatest Fan of All
So which side of the prop bet are you foolishly wagering? Both are bad bets BTW, even though one side will win.
You apparently didn't see the little emoticon thingys ------ they imply that whichever way you bet, I would bet the opposite way. Sorry to confuse you. It was supposed to be funny. It is for those of us with a sense of humor.
Incidentally, if I were to bet, which I will not, it would be on the overs with the stated odds. I expect you to post the idiocy of making that bet. I am waiting, with bated breath, for your reply. 
The only thing worse than having nothing to say is saying it.
-
I think what GFOA was saying was that you might be able to find better odds than wagering $125 to win $100 on the over. For example, $110 to win $100.
The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!
-
Red Shirt
I think if you had to bet you should bet the overs. Not only because I think that has the best chance of coming in, but if you are posting on this board I doubt you want to start rooting for losses.
But I agree with GFOA, there are a few other bets out there that are locks instead of this one...
-
Originally Posted by ThotDoc
I think what GFOA was saying was that you might be able to find better odds than wagering $125 to win $100 on the over. For example, $110 to win $100.
Thank you. Now I can un-bate my breath.
Apparently the humor I intended by the post was not as humorous as I thought. It has absolutely nothing to do with wagering and everything to do with the fact that I rarely agree with material GFOA posts. It is nice to see that he has friends to defend him though.
The only thing worse than having nothing to say is saying it.
-
Originally Posted by Pop Corn
Thank you. Now I can un-bate my breath.
Apparently the humor I intended by the post was not as humorous as I thought. It has absolutely nothing to do with wagering and everything to do with the fact that I rarely agree with material GFOA posts. It is nice to see that he has friends to defend him though.
I got it...but then again I am fluent in sarcasm
-
Originally Posted by Pop Corn
Thank you. Now I can un-bate my breath.
Apparently the humor I intended by the post was not as humorous as I thought. It has absolutely nothing to do with wagering and everything to do with the fact that I rarely agree with material GFOA posts. It is nice to see that he has friends to defend him though.
Whatcha talkin about Willis!!!
The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!
-
Red Shirt
barring some crazy injury situation to TMart, I think 9 wins is the expectation here. 8 wins would be a disappointment.
if TMart improves as we all think, and we can find some recievers who arent allergic to the ball, then 10 wins shouldnt be a huge suprise, but should just be looked at as progression, and a nice year. 11 wins is great year, one where we get some breaks of timely turnovers, and/or injuries to key players on the other team, or just the perfect storm that benefits our team. I'd like to believe that we can just pull it all together as a team, and win 11 on our own merit and great execution.
That gov't is best, which governs least -- Thomas Paine
-
Originally Posted by ShortSideOption
I think if you had to bet you should bet the overs. Not only because I think that has the best chance of coming in, but if you are posting on this board I doubt you want to start rooting for losses.
But I agree with GFOA, there are a few other bets out there that are locks instead of this one...
"Locks"? You are joking, right?
If you want a lock, go to the hardware store.
If one side of a Vegas line looks too good to be true, it probably is.
"I spent half of my money on booze, women and gambling. The other half I wasted."
-- W.C. Fields
-
Originally Posted by Blackshirts82
Am i the only one betting big on this? 8.5 games. Seems easy for coach bo.
USM - W
ucla - w ( could be tougher than originally thought though)
arkanasas state w
Idaho State W
wisconsin should be win ( revenge factor plus wisc lost lot of coaches and key players
Ohio state ( toss up)
northwester ( W) should be some revenge from last year on this game
michigan ( toss up)
mich state toss up
penn state W
Minn W
Iowa should be W
Maybe looks a little tougher on paper than i thought, but still feel Nebraska should win 9 games.
Whats everyone else think?
and my over/under 8.5 games. Idk what i was thinking. Mods help!
Your post lost all credibility for me, and I stopped reading, at the bolded words above.
"I spent half of my money on booze, women and gambling. The other half I wasted."
-- W.C. Fields
-
Originally Posted by Cardinal
Your post lost all credibility for me, and I stopped reading, at the bolded words above.
Unfortunately that game could result in our qb tossing up many many 50/50 balls
|
|
Reply With Quote
