Get HuskerMax™ on your iPhone. Click here for details. Get tickets for all home and away games here.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 45 of 45

Thread: Presidential Address from Afghanistan

  1. #31
    Guest

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    6,962
    Quote Originally Posted by RedBlack&Blue View Post
    Um, I am breathing and not upset in the least.

    No it's not realistic to assume we'll leave the mideast, and as long as we need oil (which we will for a long time), we've got interests there.

    But, the strategy of direct intervention is costly and ripe for failure.
    ok.

  2. #32
    Guest

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    6,962
    Lol. I just admitted one on obama saves billions, 57.

    slap.jpg


    EDIT: Thanks for removal of calling me a nitwit, I don't think any of the mods saw it. You can thank me for not replying to your quote, which would have preserved it.

  3. #33
    Varsity

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,398
    hrkrz (and 57 to a lesser extant),
    Since I started the thread I know that nobody is keeping score and it is not a bout, so the punching references are, as usual, unnecessary. Let's try to stay on topic, please, as there was some good conversation going before you brought your issues in.

  4. #34
    Guest

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    6,962
    Quote Originally Posted by Husker Mort View Post
    hrkrz (and 57 to a lesser extant),
    Since I started the thread I know that nobody is keeping score and it is not a bout, so the punching references are, as usual, unnecessary. Let's try to stay on topic, please, as there was some good conversation going before you brought your issues in.
    Of course, 57 to a lesser extent* because personal attacks aren't nearly as heinous as a punching photo.

  5. #35
    Guest

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Papillion, NE
    Posts
    3,743
    Quote Originally Posted by Huskers57 View Post
    uncalled for. I admit a mistake and noted as such.
    Truth.

  6. #36
    The Tech Support Guy
    Huskermedic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    22,002

    Presidential Address from Afghanistan

    It is interesting that the president is all secret about his trip but tells the talaban when we are pulling our troops out.

    So far the public time line is my big criticism of this president on the war on terror. I don't think the Bush plan had a permanent base either.

    I am one to agree with chi, we need a base in both countries. Put it out in the middle of know were with a mile of sand around it and you will see them coming. You want a base there so they will spend there resources fighting it instead of planning attack on the us.

  7. #37
    Setting aside the issues of what was said in the speech...I read a reporter's "behind the scenes" account of going there and getting out, and it was really cool. Reminded me a lot of a similar behind the scenes documentary I think that was on the History Channel? a couple of years ago showing a Bush visit to Iraq. No matter who the president is, what it takes to pull off this kind of visit in a dangerous part of the world is just amazing.

    "Always be ready to make your defense to anyone who demands from you an accounting for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and reverence." 1 Peter 3:15-16 (NRSV)

  8. #38
    Society Crazy Indeed
    Pops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    51,737
    Quote Originally Posted by nems View Post
    Is it fair to say that during Obama's term, we made zero progress in Afghanistan?

    Sure seems so.

    the great or even the better military minds than yours would disagree



    And here I am still smiling
    In the intricate asylum of society
    Well I got to be

  9. #39
    Society Crazy Indeed
    Pops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    51,737
    Quote Originally Posted by Huskermedic View Post
    It is interesting that the president is all secret about his trip but tells the talaban when we are pulling our troops out.

    So far the public time line is my big criticism of this president on the war on terror. I don't think the Bush plan had a permanent base either.

    I am one to agree with chi, we need a base in both countries. Put it out in the middle of know were with a mile of sand around it and you will see them coming. You want a base there so they will spend there resources fighting it instead of planning attack on the us.

    I'm glad the military minds are getting together on this...could you all explain to us dummies why a base would be good?



    And here I am still smiling
    In the intricate asylum of society
    Well I got to be

  10. #40
    Varsity

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,398
    Quote Originally Posted by Pops View Post
    I'm glad the military minds are getting together on this...could you all explain to us dummies why a base would be good?
    ...guess not. It seems like everything goes quiet when the President comes out with an obviously centrist proposal.

  11. #41
    The Walking Red
    nems's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    16,721
    Quote Originally Posted by Pops View Post
    the great or even the better military minds than yours would disagree
    How so? Who are these military minds that think we have made progress in Afghanistan during the last 4 years?

    Casualties aren't going down. The Taliban is about the same. The flow of arms and people from Pakistan is the same.

    But what measure have things improved?

  12. #42
    Heisman

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    McKinney, Texas, United States
    Posts
    11,787
    Quote Originally Posted by Pops View Post
    I'm glad the military minds are getting together on this...could you all explain to us dummies why a base would be good?
    Quote Originally Posted by Husker Mort View Post
    ...guess not. It seems like everything goes quiet when the President comes out with an obviously centrist proposal.
    Or maybe its because Pops asked the question at 10PM last night, and the other participants weren't sitting at their computers hanging on every Cafe post? I know I surely wasn't.

    Or maybe its because Chi had already answered the question quite eloquently hours before Pops asked it. Here, let me repeat it for you both:

    Quote Originally Posted by ChitownHusker View Post
    I didn't comment on it because I don't think there was anything new or groundbreaking in the speech. I know my friends on the left will disagree, but I am disappointed that by 2015, we will not have any permanent bases in either Iraq or Afghanistan. Both countries are strategically important, and the presence of a base or two in either country could help establish a long-term strategic deterrent against future terrorist movements taking hold in either country. The OBL archives that will be released tomorrow will show that OBL was actively planning for AQ to return to Afghanistan just as soon as the US military was gone from the country.

    FWIW, I am not proposing that we continued operations in either country -- just that we have a base there. Given that we liberated both countries from two of the most notorious regimes on the planet, I think we are entitled to a presence in both countries as a strategic deterrent. It would have been especially important in Iraq given the risks of that country becoming an Iranian client state, if it hasn't already.
    You can agree or disagree with what he said, but you can't say that no one is willing to answer the question, which was already answered in the thread earlier.

    And, according to the policy analysts this was not a "centrist proposal" because it wasn't a proposal at all. No new policies were announced, no new proposals made. It was a campaign stump speech, done at "dark-thirty" in the wee hours of the morning in Afghanistan, so not for the benefit of the Afghanistan people OR our soldiers who were mostly sleeping, I'm sure. It was done purely so that the cameras could be rolling during primetime in US time zones to broadcast the campaign speech.

  13. #43
    Varsity

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,398
    Quote Originally Posted by McKinneyTXHusker View Post
    Or maybe its because Pops asked the question at 10PM last night, and the other participants weren't sitting at their computers hanging on every Cafe post? I know I surely wasn't.

    Or maybe its because Chi had already answered the question quite eloquently hours before Pops asked it. Here, let me repeat it for you both:



    You can agree or disagree with what he said, but you can't say that no one is willing to answer the question, which was already answered in the thread earlier.

    And, according to the policy analysts this was not a "centrist proposal" because it wasn't a proposal at all. No new policies were announced, no new proposals made. It was a campaign stump speech, done at "dark-thirty" in the wee hours of the morning in Afghanistan, so not for the benefit of the Afghanistan people OR our soldiers who were mostly sleeping, I'm sure. It was done purely so that the cameras could be rolling during primetime in US time zones to broadcast the campaign speech.
    Sigh. It was only an accord to define the relationship (with a nation that has had, at best, a shaky history of rooting out terrorists within its own borders) and strategy for ending a major military conflict on the anniversary of the death of public enemy #1. Yeah, nothing worth putting any thought into there. Does it have a political upside? Sure. Was it more than a "stump speech"? It certainly was.

  14. #44
    Heisman

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    McKinney, Texas, United States
    Posts
    11,787
    Quote Originally Posted by Husker Mort View Post
    Sigh. It was only an accord to define the relationship (with a nation that has had, at best, a shaky history of rooting out terrorists within its own borders) and strategy for ending a major military conflict on the anniversary of the death of public enemy #1. Yeah, nothing worth putting any thought into there. Does it have a political upside? Sure. Was it more than a "stump speech"? It certainly was.
    You're certainly entitled to your opinions - on whether it was more than a "stump speech." I've previously noted that even such media outlets as that conservative mouthpiece the New York Times seem to disagree with you - noting that (contrary to your statement) there were no new policies or strategies announced, and the "accord" was a general document with almost no specifics whatsoever - just a "we'll support you, promise." The NYT also points out (where I got the info) that the speech was given in the middle of the night in Afghanistan, when most countrymen AND most of our service men and women there were asleep - but it DID happen to be "primetime" in the US, to make sure that stump speech was heard in the US.

    If it was such an important policy speech, it would have been in the news, and analysts and politicians on both sides would have been talking and debating it in the press. As it is, the story came and disappeared in a few hours from virtually all the media - just like all the other campaign stump speeches.

  15. #45
    Varsity

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    11,398
    Quote Originally Posted by McKinneyTXHusker View Post
    You're certainly entitled to your opinions - on whether it was more than a "stump speech." I've previously noted that even such media outlets as that conservative mouthpiece the New York Times seem to disagree with you - noting that (contrary to your statement) there were no new policies or strategies announced, and the "accord" was a general document with almost no specifics whatsoever - just a "we'll support you, promise." The NYT also points out (where I got the info) that the speech was given in the middle of the night in Afghanistan, when most countrymen AND most of our service men and women there were asleep - but it DID happen to be "primetime" in the US, to make sure that stump speech was heard in the US.

    If it was such an important policy speech, it would have been in the news, and analysts and politicians on both sides would have been talking and debating it in the press. As it is, the story came and disappeared in a few hours from virtually all the media - just like all the other campaign stump speeches.
    ...so now you rely on the "lamestream media" to tell you what is/is not news? Good to know that the Times is a conservative rag, though.







Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •