More and more coming out about Trayvon

[Pops]

Charges filed against Zimmerman?

ZING!

yes 2005 and 2007

[Pops]

Charges filed against Zimmerman?

ZING!

http://syndicatednews.net/clients/sy...ce_records.pdf

[HuskerNCorpus]

You made the claim that it had relevance to his death....not I

I did not say it was relevant to him dying. Nor did I suggest, as your silly comment claimed, that it meant he deserved to die. That's a highly disrespectful comment.

i dont care if the kid grew acres of pot and supplied the city with it....
This comment was made


you came back with

Don't get petty. Quote my entire piece. Don't end it at, "but."

I agreed that assumptions were being made about Trayvon. If you'd quote me entirely, and not just the small piece that fits your agenda, you'd see that the "but" was followed with the comment that assumptions were also being made about Zimmerman.

[HuskerNCorpus]

http://syndicatednews.net/clients/sy...ce_records.pdf

That link talks about charges being filed against Zimmerman for the shooting of Trayvon?

I must have missed that.

[HuskerNCorpus]

yes 2005 and 2007

The point that you missed is charges being filed isn't the the end-all, be-all. If charges are never filed against Zimmerman, will you come out here and take ZImmerman's side since none were filed?

If Trayvon took a swing at a bus driver, and that's still an IF, that's something to be taken into consideration. Just as Zimmerna's past violence is something to be taken into consideration.

[Pops]

I did not say it was relevant to him dying. Nor did I suggest, as your silly comment claimed, that it meant he deserved to die. That's a highly disrespectful comment.



Don't get petty. Quote my entire piece. Don't end it at, "but."

I agreed that assumptions were being made about Trayvon. If you'd quote me entirely, and not just the small piece that fits your agenda, you'd see that the "but" was followed with the comment that assumptions were also being made about Zimmerman.

you know the word "but" in the context of a sentence just eliminates everything said before it....

example...i think you're a great cop but there are better ones


just playing with ya brother settle down....Dang you folk is Corpus are wound tighter than a timex

[Pops]

That link talks about charges being filed against Zimmerman for the shooting of Trayvon?

I must have missed that.

no they show his cases in 2005 going to court for battery...thats what I was talking about his history...shows a history of violence

[HuskerNCorpus]

you know the word "but" in the context of a sentence just eliminates everything said before it....

You're 100% wrong. It's an acknowledgment that there have been assumptions and accusations made about BOTH Trayvon and Zimmerman. Why would I agree that there have been assumptions about Trayvon and then immediately say there haven't been?

example...i think you're a great cop but there are better ones

Here's a better example: Your son asks you if you love him or your other son better. You say there's no answer to that, as you love them the same. Your son asks, "don't you love me dad?" You reply, "yes, but I love your brother also."

You can play all you want. I see that you're playing, that's why I pointed out how silly your comment was.

[HuskerNCorpus]

no they show his cases in 2005 going to court for battery...thats what I was talking about his history...shows a history of violence

And a history of violence from Zimmerman is relevant. But, history of violence from Trayvon would also be relevant.

See, there's that "but" again.

[Pops]

You're 100% wrong. It's an acknowledgment that there have been assumptions and accusations made about BOTH Trayvon and Zimmerman. Why would I agree that there have been assumptions about Trayvon and then immediately say there haven't been?



Here's a better example: Your son asks you if you love him or your other son better. You say there's no answer to that, as you love them the same. Your son asks, "don't you love me dad?" You reply, "yes, but I love your brother also."

You can play all you want. I see that you're playing, that's why I pointed out how silly your comment was.

You dont love me dad?...yes and I love your bother also.

[HuskerNCorpus]

You dont love me dad?...yes and I love your bother also.

Semantics.


"Yes, but I love him also" has the same meaning as "yes and I love him also." Saying "but" does not cancel what you just said prior to it.

[RedPhoenix]

And a history of violence from Zimmerman is relevant. But, history of violence from Trayvon would also be relevant.

See, there's that "but" again.

Do you lend the same weight to a tweet as you do a police report?

[HuskerNCorpus]

Do you lend the same weight to a tweet as you do a police report?

No.

[RedPhoenix]

No.

Didn't think so.

[RedPhoenix]

This is pathetic....

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/03/28/elderly-couple-forced-out-home-after-tweet-claims-killer-trayvon-miller-lives/#ixzz1qONII6KM?test=latestnew
s

SANFORD, Fla – An elderly Florida couple have been forced to move into a hotel after their home address was wrongly tweeted as belonging to the man who shot teen Trayvon Martin.

[McKinneyTXHusker]

I agree. It disgusts me to see both sides doing it. We have a dead kid and it would appear justice and fairness have gone out the window for many.

And no, to cut you all off at the pass, justice doesn't automatically mean I want Zimmerman arrested, tried and convicted as fast as possible.

Good post, RP. It seems that 95% of the posters at HM (and similar percentages of the media and the populace) have already decided one of two things - Zimmerman is a racist who shot an unarmed black kid with absolutely zero provocation - or Zimmerman is an innocent who was attacked by the black kid.

I'll repeat what you said for emphasis. It disgusts me to see both sides doing it.

[McKinneyTXHusker]

I'll admit that we don't have all the facts, but I'm more inclined to think that Zimmerman acted out of a blindly stupid wannabe cop mentality than as someone racially motivated to commit a violent act.

Yep.

[HuskerNCorpus]

This is pathetic....

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/03/28/elderly-couple-forced-out-home-after-tweet-claims-killer-trayvon-miller-lives/#ixzz1qONII6KM?test=latestnew
s

SANFORD, Fla – An elderly Florida couple have been forced to move into a hotel after their home address was wrongly tweeted as belonging to the man who shot teen Trayvon Martin.

Spike Lee is an idiot.

[Pops]

And a history of violence from Zimmerman is relevant. But, history of violence from Trayvon would also be relevant.

See, there's that "but" again.

and as a public speaker the word "but" is taught not to be used. I am certified through Langevin training services.
just sayin since you seem to want to keep it going

http://www.speakingforresults.com/ar...and/index.html

[Lakewood Husker]

no they show his cases in 2005 going to court for battery...thats what I was talking about his history...shows a history of violence

I know you believe people can change, and in this instance what my opinion is and I think what Corpus is saying is that trayvon was showing a tendency of going in the wrong direction while Zimmerman was showing a tendency of going in the right direction. now all that means little in the face of the impending evidence and such, but from my view when I hear a kid of any race,or financial level that is finding trouble more and more frequently and suspensions are becoming more and more part of his life I am correct to wonder if he was a little too aggresive in this instance.

I repeat this doesn't mean anyone deserves to die it just adds some context to who the people are in all of this sordid debacle.