-
To hoop or not to hoop?
http://m.omaha.com/om/db_90923/conte...tguid=hJ4qcrNl
A hoop on a driveway?
Neighbors said no way.
The Merrifield Village Homeowners Association filed a lawsuit against Lewis last year - and went to trial Wednesday to try to take down her hoop.
So stupid. To hell with homeowner associations.
And one wonders why America is getting fat and lazy!
 Originally Posted by CombatTargeteer
I trust 57
 Originally Posted by HuskerWeatherman
He is the messiah.
-
Some of my best times as a kid in the 60's and 70's was playing hoops in the driveway with my buddies.
-
Heisman

I agree that this particular rule is dumb, but I don't have an overall problem with homeowners associations. Neighborhood covenants help keep things nice. I don't want to live in a crap-hole.
-
Guest

 Originally Posted by huskrthill
I agree that this particular rule is dumb, but I don't have an overall problem with homeowners associations. Neighborhood covenants help keep things nice. I don't want to live in a crap-hole.
Governing is best when done at the lowest level possible. The neighborhood knows what is best for its members.
-
This is clearly a racist policy.
-
#1 Infractor

The covenants were in place before they moved to the sub-division. You don't like them don't move there or get the rule changed first.
-
Red Shirt
I'm with those who think the homeowner should have checked the covenants first.
Still, I gotta wonder if there wasn't something else that made this issue blow up like this. I have to think that my family broke quite a few HOA rules when I was growing up, yet as far as I know, my folks were never contacted by our subdivision's HOA. We were lucky to live on a block that had a lot of families with small kids, and not a lot of busy-bodies. Still, I wonder if there isn't some personal stuff that's gone on between this particular homeowner, and some of the people in the subdivision.
-
#1 Infractor

 Originally Posted by Porkchopexpress
I'm with those who think the homeowner should have checked the covenants first.
Still, I gotta wonder if there wasn't something else that made this issue blow up like this. I have to think that my family broke quite a few HOA rules when I was growing up, yet as far as I know, my folks were never contacted by our subdivision's HOA. We were lucky to live on a block that had a lot of families with small kids, and not a lot of busy-bodies. Still, I wonder if there isn't some personal stuff that's gone on between this particular homeowner, and some of the people in the subdivision.
It sounds like one of those situations where you are better off saying sorry then asking permission. The Village specifically told her no and she did it anyway.
-
 Originally Posted by huskrthill
I agree that this particular rule is dumb, but I don't have an overall problem with homeowners associations. Neighborhood covenants help keep things nice. I don't want to live in a crap-hole.
Then put in rules that say it has to be an in ground hoop at the top of the driveway and must be a range of models. A hoop does not make a Neighborhood a crap-hole. This is an example of an overbearing HOA rule.
Born a Nebraskan, raised a Nebraskan, will die a Nebraskan!! Go Big Red!
Men of Israel, consider carefully what you intend to do to these men. Some time ago Theudas appeared, claiming to be somebody, and about four hundred men rallied to him. He was killed, all his followers were dispersed, and it all came to nothing. After him, Judas the Galilean appeared in the days of the census and led a band of people in revolt. He too was killed, and all his followers were scattered. Therefore, in the present case I advise you: Leave these men alone! Let them go! For if their purpose or activity is of human origin, it will fail. But if it is from God, you will not be able to stop these men; you will only find yourselves fighting against God.” - Gamalie the Pharisee - Addressing the Sanhedrin regarding the new group called Christians
"I support collecting more in taxes from people with high incomes who choose to actually pay taxes at lower tax rates than use lawyers and accountants to avoid taxes at higher tax rates," he wrote. "Some tax revenues at low tax rates is a heckuva lot better than no tax revenues at high tax rates." - Art Laffer (on 999 plan)
-
#1 Infractor

The Homeowner won the case. The Association had failed to enforce the same covenants for other homeowners. Which sounds like the right decision.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...MPLATE=DEFAULT
-
Recruit
Right decision by the court in this case, but as a homebuyer, you've got to do your homework on these kind of HOA issues. If you're not going to like or abide by the rules, find a different house.
-
 Originally Posted by Porkchopexpress
Still, I wonder if there isn't some personal stuff that's gone on between this particular homeowner, and some of the people in the subdivision.
This is probably the root of this whole fiasco.
That said, I'm glad the homeowner won against the fascist HOA.
 Originally Posted by CombatTargeteer
I trust 57
 Originally Posted by HuskerWeatherman
He is the messiah.
-
Heisman

 Originally Posted by Huskermedic
Then put in rules that say it has to be an in ground hoop at the top of the driveway and must be a range of models. A hoop does not make a Neighborhood a crap-hole. This is an example of an overbearing HOA rule.
I think that's what I said. This particular rule is dumb, but HOAs in general are not.
-
Heisman

 Originally Posted by Huskers57
This is probably the root of this whole fiasco.
That said, I'm glad the homeowner won against the fascist HOA. 
It seems like you have a problem with HOAs in general. Why is that?
-
 Originally Posted by huskrthill
It seems like you have a problem with HOAs in general. Why is that?
Just when it comes to stupid regulations like these.
I recall a fiasco a while back about flags (USA flags at that) being displayed...I'll have to find those articles.
 Originally Posted by CombatTargeteer
I trust 57
 Originally Posted by HuskerWeatherman
He is the messiah.
-
Heisman

 Originally Posted by Huskers57
Just when it comes to stupid regulations like these.
I recall a fiasco a while back about flags (USA flags at that) being displayed...I'll have to find those articles.
Yeah, I remember that one. It was stupid, too.
But that doesn't mean HOAs in general are bad. Most are probably pretty good.
-
#1 Infractor

 Originally Posted by Huskers57
Just when it comes to stupid regulations like these.
I recall a fiasco a while back about flags (USA flags at that) being displayed...I'll have to find those articles.
A lot of the regulations in HOA are just subject to prior approval so that a committee can see what a homeowner is going to do. For example: Putting up a detached structure may have some requirements i.e. be similar in roof pitch, siding color, shingle color and be in proximity to the house. Dog runs may be allowed but require them to be next to the house and located in the back, etc. They all need approval to maintain teh integrity of the area.
Things like leaving a disabled car in the drive way, parking a travel trailer in your side yard, storing garbage cans in teh front of your house, parking a boat in the driveway all winter are some of the rules that aren't negotiable.
There is no question having a HOA maintains the quality of the entire development and is why many people prefer to live in a development that has a HOA.
-
Nobody told him he HAD to buy a house with a HOA attached. That is all I am saying. The HOA lost this due to their own inaction prior, not because the rules weren't broken.
|
|